The time has
come to question if Islam is protected under our First Amendment rights to
freedom of religion. Yes, everyone in America has the right to freedom of
religion, but Islam is not a religion. Religious faith is only a part of Islam.
The rest is a socially engineered society with its own laws and customs that
seriously conflict with American law.
Is Great
Britain a religion because they have the Church of England? Of course not.
Britain has an established charter, civil and criminal laws, and a society that
respects those laws. Islam has the Qur'an that provides the governing charter,
complete with laws, punishment, and social behavior for its people in addition
to its religious teachings. If Islam is a religion, then Britain is
also.
We must
recognize that religion is only one aspect of Islam‘s Qur'an. The rest of this
charter advances ideas, social behavior, and laws that are in direct conflict
with American and western laws and values. Teddy Roosevelt once said that to
live in America, immigrants must have undivided loyalty to America and to no one
else. How is that possible for Muslims who swear loyalty to Islam where their
governing laws are found in the Qur‘an?
What legitimate
religion would demand that its members either kill or convert people of other
faiths? What legitimate religion is intent on imposing its own laws on the rest
of the entire world? If Islam were just about praying to Allah and worshiping
Mohammed and nothing more, we would not be having a problem with Islamism and
Islamic terrorists. Islam has a global mission to take over and run the world
according to Islamic Shariah law. How can we call that a
religion?
Colorado Native Art is a collection of original carvings,
paintings and photography native to the rich Native American, Spanish and
Southwestern culture in Colorado. Each item is a unique, hand-crafted treasure.
For only the second time in my adult life, I am not ashamed of
my country. I want to thank the hard working American people for paying $242
thousand dollars plus additional expenses for my vacation in Spain. My daughter
Sasha, several long-time family friends, my personal staff and various guests
had a wonderful time. Honestly, you just haven't lived until you have stayed in
a $2,500.00 per night suite at a 5-Star luxury hotel. We only booked 70 rooms
for our friends, staff and family. Thank you also for the use of Air Force 2 and
the 70 Secret Service personnel who tagged along to be sure we were safe and
cared for at all times.
Air Force 2 only used 47,500 gallons of jet fuel for this trip
and carbon emissions were a mere 1,031 tons of CO2. It costs only $11,500 per
hour to operate Air Force 2 and each additional plane for the other members of
our party group. These are only rough estimates, but they are close (who's
counting?). That's quite a carbon footprint as my good friend Al Gore would say,
so we must ask the American citizens to drive smaller, more fuel efficient cars
and drive less too, so we can lessen our combined carbon footprint.
I know times are hard and millions of you are struggling to put
food on the table and trying to make ends meet. I do appreciate your sacrifice
and do hope you find work soon. I was really exhausted after Barack took our
family on a luxury vacation in Maine a few weeks ago. I just had to get away for
a few days. Will write more from Martha's Vineyard where we will spend our sixth
vacation this year with more of our family and friends.
Cordially, Michelle Obama
Criminal Court - Literally
When United States District Court judge for the District of
Arizona, Susan Bolton, heard and ruled on the Arizona 1070 immigration law, she
violated both her oath of office and the Constitution.
The Constitution has vested the Supreme Court with Original
Jurisdiction over 11 issues, among those are issues involving the states. All
other Courts are not allowed to intervene in cases where the Supreme Court has
jurisdiction. The Judge in Arizona violated her oath of office to preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution and should be removed from office for
violating her oath.
The Constitution makes this very clear. Article III, Section 1:
"In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls,
and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have
original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme
Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such
exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."
So there it is. Judge Bolton had no legal authority under the
Constitution to hear this case.
States may not engage in war against a foreign power unless
they are invaded. This is found as the last clause in Article I, Section 10.
"No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage,
keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or
compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless
actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of
delay."
Arizona has certainly been invaded by subjects of Mexico.
It is important to point out in connection with the above:
Article IV, Section 4.: The United States shall guarantee to every state in
this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them
against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive
(when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.
These two last paragraphs grant Arizona the constitutional
right and responsibility to defend their state in view of the federal government
failing to live up to its constitutional responsibilities.
Should Islam be Banned in the U.S.?
The Internal Security Act of
1950, along with the 1954 Communist Control
Act provides extensive legal grounds for criminalizing
organizations dedicated to the overthrow of the United States, as well as
membership in such organizations-- and even provides for the removal of
citizenship from members of such organizations.
Or to simply quote the Internal Security Act again
Sec. 4. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to
combine, conspire, or agree, with any other person to perform any act which
would substantially contribute to the establishment within the United States of
a totalitarian dictatorship
Since Islam represents a totalitarian
dictatorship, any organization or individual seeking to establish Islamic Law or
Sharia within the United States, can be held liable and charged over its
violation. This would apply to both Muslims and non-Muslims.
And the
Koran or Qur’an itself represents a volume whose contents implicitly call for
the violent overthrow of the United States.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it
cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable,
for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst
those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys,
heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a
traitor, he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face
and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of
all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the
night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that
it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.” — Marcus Tullius Cicero,
Roman orator and statesman, 42 B.C.
Who is Ed Mezvinsky?
Edward "Ed" Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937, is a former
congressman. A Democrat, he represented Iowa's 1st congressional district in the
United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to
1977.
In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to
31 of 69 charges of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Nearly $10 million
was involved in the crimes. Shortly after his indictment, he was diagnosed with
bipolar disorder, but the judge at his trial disallowed a mental illness
defense. After serving five years in federal prison, he was released in April
2008. He is expected to remain on federal probation until 2011, and owes
substantial restitution to his victims.
Who, exactly is "Ed" Mezvinsky?
He's Chelsea Clinton's new Father-in-Law.
Now...how do you think that our
"All the news that's fit to print" media would have handled this information, if
one of George and Laura's daughters had married Marc
Mezvinsky?
Views and opinions expressed on this website do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of this website or its owner (but usually do). Any copyrighted work on this
site is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit
research and educational purposes only in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107