nation divided against itself
JR Dieckmann??? Sept. 6, 2015
?A nation divided against itself cannot stand.? The words of Abraham
Lincoln have more significance today than they did in 1861. Back then there
were just two factions opposed to each other, the northern states verses the 13
territories of the Confederacy. Today we have a multitude of isolated ethnic
communities living within our states which have no interest in assimilating to
American culture but prefer to retain their own foreign customs and culture.
Whether by intention or by circumstance, the result is the same, a nation
divided against itself.
This is the goal of Barack Hussein 0bama and his progressive and
anti-American regime, but it was started long before 0 came to power by
arrogant, ignorant and overly tolerant sissy politicians ? many of whom still
remain in in powerful congressional positions today in both parties. How does
this end? It ends with America losing its national identity, language, and
white European ancestry to be replaced by a gaggle of various breeds of ethnic
groups of different color and languages with nothing in common with each other
and all pitted against each other. We are headed for utter chaos if we?re not
Liberals have this globalist notion that America should be a mix of all
the world?s people rather than the offspring of the kind of people who founded
and built this country. They relish in the words taken from a French poet and
posted at the foot of the Statue of Liberty: Give us your sick, your poor, your
ignorant, your criminals, your social rejects, your welfare dependents, your
blacks, your Hispanics, your Muslims, and all those who the rest of the world
rejects. Yeah, we?ll unite them all into one melting pot with common patriotism
and goals for our great nation.
BULLSHIT! What we end up with is a salad bowl, a barnyard of different
breeds of animals who all want to eat each other and fight for influence and
control of the farm. There is no unity, only friction and antagonistic
diversity that is destroying what was once a great and united nation.
Liberals like to say ?Diversity made this nation great.? No, it didn?t.
It was the Anglo-Europeans who came here and built a new nation with
constitutionally guaranteed rights, freedom, and liberties. With their hands
free of oppressive government, they were free to create and build this country
into a shining city on the hill where everyone had an opportunity to achieve
their dreams and rise to their highest potential. The result was the fastest
growing, most industrious and creative country in the world. That is what made
America great. Diversity is only destroying what has taken hard working
Americans more than two and a half centuries to build and 228 years to make it
We no longer need immigrants, the nation is now well populated if not
overpopulated. But if people from other countries want to be accepted in
America, they need to come here to assimilate into American culture and
language with skills we can use, be responsible for themselves, and not be a
burden on our society. They need to adopt American values and disciplines and
become productive Americans. They need to leave their old country ways in the
Unfortunately, those are not the kind of people we?ve been importing
since Ted Kennedy?s rewrite of our immigration policy in 1965 with the same
goal that 0bama has today -- to change the face and demographics of America. By
doing that, they shift the voting public to the left to elect left wing
socialists to government office with meaningless rhetoric aimed at minority
groups. Spineless congressional Republicans have ignored and allowed this
abomination for decades and in doing so have betrayed their electorate, the
Founders, the Constitution, and the entire country. With unconstitutional
handouts of the taxpayers? money, they have turned a nation of productivity and
personal responsibility into a welfare sanctuary for foreigners.
Isn?t it time our Republican politicians started representing the best
interests of our country and let other countries deal with their own problems?
America is not a dump site for the rest of the world?s refuse -- at least it
wasn?t prior to the last couple of administrations -- yet more and more we see
Republican politicians pandering like Democrats to minority ethnic groups instead of mainstream Americans. Who is representing and speaking out for us traditional Americans? Only Donald Trump so far and that is why he is resonating so powerfully with real Americans.
It now seems that everything this 0bama government does is the
antithesis of what is good for America, but what may be good for the ?global
community.? What is that? There is no such thing as a ?global community,? at
least not on this planet. But it?s what the globalists wish to create by force
if necessary should the people disagree. And we, the people, do strongly
The United States of America is an exceptional country because of our
Founders and we want to keep it that way. If other countries want to adopt our
ways they are welcome to do that, but we have no desire to fit into a
one-size-fits-all global community, we here in America are capitalists not
This planet is made up of diverse countries with vastly different
cultures, traditions, history, and people. There is no such thing as a ?global
community,? in spite of what the UN and globalists want you to believe. Each
country has its own way of living and thinking with little interest in
conforming UN community mandates. Likewise, Americans have no interest in
dispersing our wealth and productivity to third world countries to make them
more equal. Need I remind you that equality among nations is the UN?s ?Agenda
21? plan for world domination.
We can thank our backstabbing politicians and treasonous politicians who
have ignored the Constitution and refused to inforce the immigration laws that
were established to protect America and American culture from the foreign
invasion that we now have.
Did Ellis Island sink? Instead of importing foreign nationals who
want to become Americans to make a better life for themselves and contribute
their skills and abilities to our society, we now import hordes of dissimilar
groups of people who want nothing more than to destroy our society and replace
it with their own alien and perverted subcultures.
Maybe this New World Order globalization attempt isn?t going to work
Got Ebola? Want to come to America?
Have no fear
Barack Obola Airlines
is here for you.
Obola Airlines offers direct flights five
times a day from Sierra Leone,
Liberia, and Guinea with connecting flights
from Nigeria and Senegal.
(Note: those coming from Nigeria, don?t
forget your laptops
to keep up with all those responses to your
million $ emails.)
In exchange for each West African traveler to
America on Obola Air,
we will send an American soldier to Liberia
to take your place.
Upon your arrival you will receive free
medical care, free housing,
food stamps, and a pre-filled Democrat voter
And just think of how many Americans you can
infect by claiming that
you have not been in the hot zone or in
contact with any Ebola victims!
If you are already showing visible symptoms
of the disease you will be
met by men in white suits and receive the
best medical care in the world.
What about the cost? Don?t worry about the
American taxpayers will be happy to cover the
costs for you.
This is your chance of a lifetime to
participate in Ebola research
even if your life expectancy is only a few
more days or weeks.
Even of other airlines suspend service from
West Africa, we won?t.
President Obama wants you to fly here on
Barack Obola Airlines.
Remember our motto:
"Never let a crisis go to waste!"
Advertisement paid for by Democrat fund
raising events featuring guest speaker, Barack Obama
Hellary Clinton said in San Francisco this week that ?One of our
most deeply held American values is equality.? Nonsense! That statement
would have our Founders turning over in their graves, but it?s what the Left
wants you to believe along with the idea of ?social justice.? What exactly do
they mean by that?
One of our most deeply held values is not ?equality? but rather
that all men (and women) are created equal and entitled to equal justice and
protection under the law. Social and economic inequality is the direct
result of individual freedom, ingenuity, and ambition as you progress through
life. That is the value that our Founders believed in and that is the value
that this country was founded upon. It is one of our most deeply held American
values which I believe is just the opposite of what Hellary was postulating.
If you want equality then go to North Korea, Communist China, or
the Soviet Union when Putin finishes rebuilding it. There you will find that
all subjects are equal and share equally in poverty and servitude. But that?s
not America and ?equality? is not the American way. Personal freedom and
liberty assures us the opportunity to become unequal in many respects within
this society. Our equality lies in the opportunities to become whatever you
want to be. Equality at birth, from then it?s up to you. You can remain a
dependent baby all of your life, or you can make something of yourself. You can
choose to remain equal or you can choose to become unequal.
In 1787 the Founding Fathers completed the construction of our
Constitution and establishment of our government. Upon leaving the
Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin was asked by a woman, ?Sir, what
have you given us?? Franklin replied with ?A republic, mam, if you can keep
it.? Obama, Mrs. Clinton, and the rest of the radical left have been promoting
?democracy? in foreign nations and characterizing the U.S. as a democracy ? it
Our nation is a republic with a republican form of government
which is very well explained in a great 10 minute video at http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/
I recommend that you watch it to learn more about the logic behind our Founding
Fathers choice in government and the pitfalls of the other 3 forms of
government which include a democracy (mob rule).
By 1828 a group of early Americans decided that they couldn?t
?keep it? and formed the Democratic party. They were
basically low education, non-industrious, dependent people who thought European
style socialism would work better for them ? just as they do today. Some had
come to America seeking freedom and liberty, while still others came thinking
it was the land of free milk and honey. They found themselves incapable of
taking care of themselves and began demanding government assistance and
handouts from the productive taxpayers.
They became the majority of voters for a time and elected Andrew
Jackson as their president. Well, their only opposition was the Northern Whigs,
made up mostly of successful, industrious, and affluent entrepreneurs and
workers who were quite busy building this new country. But as it is today, the
successful, industrious, and freedom-loving builders of America were in a
But in 1854, a bunch of the more educated Democrats split away
from the Democrat party, partly over slavery which they opposed and the threats
to their liberty and to the republic. They joined with the Northern Whigs to
form the Republican Party ? a party based on, and in support of, the form of
government that our Founders intended ? a Republican form of government. They
elected America?s first Republican president, Abraham Lincoln.
The slaves were freed and founded the first American ghettos.
Later on they created hip-hop and rap to reflect their lives in the ghetto.
After a short time, young whites began listening to the [c]rap and they too
adopted the mentality of the ghetto and registered as Democrats, thinking that
America is a democracy because that is what they have heard from the radical
left, the media, and probably the government run school system if they finished
school at all. Well, if America is a democracy then wouldn?t it be patriotic to
join the Democratic party?
When once asked how she viewed herself in the political spectrum
during the 08 campaigns, Clinton stated that she considered herself as an early
20th century Progressive. A firm supporter and believer in a
movement founded in 1880 on the principal of big government socialism.
This contrasts dramatically with Abraham Lincoln?s view of
America: ??The legitimate object of government, is to do
for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but cannot do, at
all, or cannot, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual
capacities.? Lincoln?s statement referred to such things as national
security, a national currency, foreign negotiations and treaties, interstate
roads, a post office, etc. The various things that must be done on a national
basis and within the limits of the Constitution.
Now, Hellary Clinton wants to be president of a nation founded on
values and principals which are diametrically opposed to her lifelong beliefs
and values. What credentials and accomplishments does she possess to qualify
her for this position? Well, roughly the same as Barack Obama ? none, and we
can all see what a mess that has created for the nation and the world.
Mrs. Clinton?s only claim to fame is that she is, technically, the
wife of Bill Clinton and shares his name. She had a chance to show some
leadership ability and competence as Secretary of State but failed to
accomplish anything beyond getting Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans
killed in Benghazi. That?s not much of a resume but it?s all she has to run on.
Mrs. Clinton would seem to be no different from Barack Obama, who
would seem to be the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler and Neville Chamberlain all
rolled into one. He is Adolf Hitler on domestic policy and Neville Chamberlain
on national security and foreign policy. That is increasingly becoming the last
thing we need at this point in history.
Clinton and Obama thought they could change the world with a
Staples ?EASY? button relabeled with the word ?RESET? and it would be just that
easy. Obama told Putin that he would have more flexibility after the election
and we all know how that?s working out. Putin has now become the supreme leader
of the world as America follows from behind NATO and the UN. But it?s not just
Putin who is taking advantage of American weakness under this despicable and
un-American regime in Washington.
Islamic terrorism has now become a larger threat than it was just
prior to 911 and Obama has invited the Muslim Brotherhood into key positions in
his administration. In 1995, Obama stated: ?Should
the political winds shift in an ugly direction, I will side with the Muslims.?? No question about it, he now has. And it?s
not just the Muslims he sides with, it is also the communists and anyone else
who is considered an enemy of America. Now Obama tells the Washington Press
Corp that he has no plan or strategy for dealing with ISIS and we should not
expect one anytime in the near future. Doesn?t that just make you feel
confident and secure?
I would like to end this spiel with one last thought. I am sick
and tired of hearing the phrase ?Radical Islam.? Although I will concede that
there are peaceful Muslims ? mostly those who were raised here in America.
Islam is not a ?peaceful religion? as stated by George W. Bush, in fact it?s
not a religion at all. Islam IS a radical and violent governing doctrine which
uses religion in part to control its people by convincing them that their
violence and brutality is serving God?s will. How stupid do you have to be to
If there is any truth to the myth that Islam is peaceful and has
been hijacked by ?radical Islamists? then why doesn?t the ?peaceful? majority
do anything about it? Why do we not see ?peaceful? Islamic leaders standing up
to the radicals but instead we see Muslim clerics advancing and encouraging
violence? And think about this? Does it not bother Islamic leaders that their
?peaceful religion? is being dammed and severely damaged by the violent and
radical acts of their followers? Does it not bother them that their ?religion?
is being seen by most of the world as invalid and evil? If they are not
complicit in the jihad then why do they remain silent and tolerate it?
Can you imagine the backlash and discipline that would be imposed
by religious leaders of any other religion if their members were to do what
Muslims are doing, not only to themselves but to the world in whole? This kind
of behavior would simply not be tolerated as it is in the Muslim communities. I
can only conclude from that, that there is no peaceful Islam and that the
entire cult is radical, violent, and a threat to the rest of the world. There
is no ?radical Islam,? there is only Islam and its armies of militants. They
all read from the same book.
We can try to contain al Qaeda, Ansar al Sharia, ISIS, al Qaeda in
_____ (name your country), but no sooner do we get a handle on one does another
one pop up. We can no longer view this problem with tunnel-vision focused
simply on one Islamic group or another. This cycle will repeat and continue
repeating until the real problem is recognized and accepted, that the real
problem is Islam and Islam must be defeated or destroyed.
If Islam wants to survive then Islamic nations and states need to
take responsibility and control of their terrorists and put a stop to this
Islamic jihad because our next president is not likely to be so
complacent, tolerant, and ineffective as this current one is.
Islamic leaders need to be put on notice that your days are
numbered if you allow this murder and rampage to continue or allow it to spill
over into the civilized world. If you allow your people to behave like animals,
then soon we will treat them as animals. We don?t coddle and appease a rabid
dog, we kill it. That is who America is. We stand up for our people and our
values, at least we did until this current administration. But that is only a
temporary situation. It is not our responsibility to control your uncivilized
people, it is yours.
Islam, you have 2 years and 3 months left to try to destroy us. After
that, we will destroy you and your destruction will be led by a real America
president. Obama does not represent us as you will soon find out. Mohammed told
you that Islam will come to an end when Mecca and Medina are destroyed. Is that
what it?s going to take to end your insane violence and barbarism?
I see no indication that you have any intentions of taking
responsibility for the criminal and barbaric acts of your people, nor any
desire to control them. I must assume therefore that you are in full agreement
with them, their actions and their goals. Forget about your insane idea of 72
virgins, a lot of good they will do you after you?ve left your body, or do you
think you will be taking your dicks with you? You will go to your graves in
hell where you belong (where the virgins will be fat and ugly and just other
males that you have killed), if not for your despicable treatment of other
human beings, then for your utter stupidity in believing the evil garbage
taught you by Mohammed ? the false prophet and agent of Satan.?
That?s my opinion and I?m sticking with it.